Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Fitzgerald v. Whipple

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1879PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Motion for order to show cause.

1Per curiam

A mandamus would be entirely inefficient in reaching the mischief complained of, as no court by such means could keep up a continuous or repeated attendance. Courts are not created to conduct the municipal affairs of cities, and nothing short of any such.general supervision would reach such cases as the present. The remedy, if there is one, is not judicial. .This is not a case where there is some specific right involved, but is a general violation of public duty.

Mandamus denied.

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Matter of Walsh v. LaguardiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. People ex rel. Bartlett v. BusseIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Wilson v. ClevelandMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Gowan v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  5. People ex rel. Cady v. IhnkenMichigan Supreme Court · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API