Legal Opinion
In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Simmons
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 27, 1962No. C. D. 1082PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOtt, J.
June 6, 1960, J. Lael Simmons, an attorney at law, authorized to practice in Washington, was charged with conduct violative of his oath of attorney and certain Canons of Professional Ethics.
The complaint detailed factual allegations of specific acts of unprofessional conduct in his capacity as attorney for the guardianship estates of Frederick John Carroll and Laura F. Carroll, incompetent persons, for the estate of Laura F. Carroll, deceased, and for surreptitiously taking from the safe-deposit box of the guardian of these estates certain bonds of a cash value in excess of $4,000,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against CaseWashington Supreme Court · 1961
- In Re the Proceedings for the Discipline of ThackerWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceedings Against BallouWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- In re the Proceedings for the Discipline of FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceedings Against PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Neal Clark v. State of Washington, and Washington State Bar Association, an Agency of State Government, the State Bar of California, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- State Ex Rel. Schwab v. Washington State Bar Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against KennedyWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against PenningtonWashington Supreme Court · 1968
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.