Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gordon v. Oregon State Penitentiary

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 1, 1978No. 11-77-236, CA 9860Published

1DissentLee, J.

The majority disposes of this case, per curiam, by citing Duncan v. OSCI, 35 Or App 81, 580 P2d 1047 (1978). In Duncan we erroneously avoided consideration of the "proceedings underlying the order” which ORS 421.195 authorizes us to review. I dissent because the Corrections Division has not followed its own rule.1

Petitioner was found guilty by a prison disciplinary committee of disobeying an order. The final order of the superintendent placed petitioner in segregation for nine days. Petitioner’s primary contention is that the disciplinary committee violated its own rules and due process by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Bekins v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Moore v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, COR. DIV.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  5. Hale v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, ETC.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API