Legal Opinion
Roussel v. Guiterrez
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 24, 1930No. 12,079PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJanvier, J.
This matter comes before us on motion to dismiss the appeal because of the fact that the transcript was not lodged in the office of the clerk until more than three days after the return day.
The record shows that the return day *701fixed was June 4, 1929. The record was filed in this court on June 10, 1929.
Though we do not see that it has any material bearing, we find in the record a certificate of the deputy clerk of the civil district court showing that the transcript was prepared and ready for filing some time before the return day. Therefore the delay could not have been chargeable to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Collins Piano Co. v. CospelichLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- Bourgh v. HesterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1924
- Causey v. Central Construction Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Rooney v. Checker Cab Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1926
- Day v. St. Joe Brick WorksLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1926
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hotard v. Consolidated CompaniesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
- Young v. Carnahan CreameryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
- Roussel v. WilsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
- Scott v. DaubertLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935