Legal Opinion

Muenzenmayer v. Hood

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 11, 1916No. 20,036PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Geary district court; Roswell L. King, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

Plaintiffs sued on two promissory notes and recovered. The defendants appeal. The plaintiffs, who seem to have been implement dealers, helped the agent of a machinery company sell to defendant Joseph Hood a separator and a second-hand engine, and one of the plaintiffs appears to have guaranteed the engine to do good work and to be satisfactory and that he would stand behind the deal. There is no showing of serious defects in the separator, but there was testimony that the engine would not work and that complaint was made to the plaintiffs, who…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hartwell v. Equitable Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  2. McCreary v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Geiger v. CardwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API