State Tax Commission v. Eagle Picher Mining & Smelting Co.
Arizona Supreme Court
1DissentDe Concini, Justice
I add my dissent to that of Mr. Justice PHELPS. I dissent on the following grounds:
The majority opinion 1) disregards res judicata and our statutes; 2) is guilty of judicial legislation; 3) condones double taxation; 4) ignores stare decisis re: “Development” costs.
I will use the terms, “court” in referring to the majority opinion; the “state”.in referring to appellant; the “company” in referring to the appellee.
Res Judicata and Judicial Legislation.
The following sections of 1939 A.C.A. are pertinent: •
Sections 73-106 empowers the tax commission to assess producing mines.
Section 73-202…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State Tax Commission v. United Verde Extension Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
- State Tax Commission v. Magma Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1932
- State Tax Commission v. Phelps Dodge Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1945
- State Tax Commission v. Eagle-Picher Mining & Smelting Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1951