Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Tax Commission v. Eagle Picher Mining & Smelting Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1952No. 5316Published

1DissentDe Concini, Justice

I add my dissent to that of Mr. Justice PHELPS. I dissent on the following grounds:

The majority opinion 1) disregards res judicata and our statutes; 2) is guilty of judicial legislation; 3) condones double taxation; 4) ignores stare decisis re: “Development” costs.

I will use the terms, “court” in referring to the majority opinion; the “state”.in referring to appellant; the “company” in referring to the appellee.

Res Judicata and Judicial Legislation.

The following sections of 1939 A.C.A. are pertinent: •

Sections 73-106 empowers the tax commission to assess producing mines.

Section 73-202…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Tax Commission v. United Verde Extension Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
  2. State Tax Commission v. Magma Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1932
  3. State Tax Commission v. Phelps Dodge Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1945
  4. State Tax Commission v. Eagle-Picher Mining & Smelting Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API