Legal Opinion

Schuberth v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 4, 1925No. Appeal 191½PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Tkexleb, J.,

In 1902 Andrew H. Schuberth received a policy from defendant company for $1,000 payable at his death to Helen L. Schuberth, beneficiary, if she survived him, otherwise to his legal representatives. Insured did not reserve the privilege of changing the beneficiary. The policy contained a clause, “Cash Loans — If this policy be continued in force, thednsured may borrow from the company the amount specified in the following table, by making written application for the loan and assigning the policy to the company as security in accordance with the terms of the company’s loan…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  2. Eagle v. New York Life InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Healy v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaNew York Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Henderson EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Knoche, Admr. v. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of N.Y.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Jeske, Admx. v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Golden v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  5. PENNSYLVANIA CO., ETC. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API