Legal Opinion

Macfarlane & Co. v. Wright

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided February 13, 1902Published

In Equity. f Application for injunction to re- <( strain issuance of certain liquor licenses.

1Opinion of the Court

Tbis is an application for an injunction prayed for by the plaintiffs against William H. Wright, Treasurer of the Territory of Hawaii, to restrain 'him from the further issuance of certain beer licenses, so called which it is claimed were, issued under the provisions of Chapter 46 of thei Session Laws of 1888, said Chapter 46 being part Y. of Chapter 41 of the “Penal Laws of tbie Hawaiian Islands 1897” entitled “Stile of Malt Liquors”, also, that this Court declare said Statute unconstitutional amid void.

Tho facts appear1 to. be these:

*208The plaintiffs, Macfaxlane & Go., Limited, Peacock & Go.,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Welton v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Leloup v. Port of MobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Barry v. EdmundsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Walling v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Webber v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1881

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API