Mark Yick Hee v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
In Error’to the District Court of the United Statens for the Southern. District of New York. This cause comes here on writ of error to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York to review a judgment entered upon a verdict of guilt rendered July 7, 1914. The plaintiffs in error are hereinafter referred to as the defendants.
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
The defendants are accused of a violation of two statutes of the United States, and there are two counts in the indictment. The indictment in the first count charged the defendants with a violation of. section 11 of the act of Congress of May 6, 1882, known as the Chinese Exclusion Act, as amended and added to by the act of July 5, 1884 (22 Stat. p. 58; 23 Stat. p. 115). That section reads as follows:
“Sec. 11. That any person who shall knowingly bring into or cause to be brought into the United States by land, or who shall aid or abet the same, or aid or abet the landing…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Weems v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Wiborg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Crawford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Clyatt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Holmgren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
3Cited by15 opinions
- Goldberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1924
- Graham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- Oppenheim v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- Mercer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1932
- Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.