Legal Opinion

Cataldo v. Hertz Corp.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 30, 1973PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff appeals a decision of the Appellate Division dismissing a report of alleged erroneous rulings by.a judge of the Municipal Court of the City of Boston. The plaintiff seeks recovery from the Hertz Corporation (Hertz) and one Jack N. Krueger for damage to his motor vehicle which, while being driven by his wife, collided with a parked truck owned by Hertz, leased to Krueger’s employer, and driven by Krueger. In acting on the plaintiff’s requests for rulings in the case against Krueger the trial judge found that the accident “was caused solely by negligence of Donna Cataldo,” the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Newcomb v. Boston Protective DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  2. Falk v. FinkelmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  3. Wall v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. J.L. v. MortellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API