McDole v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
46 So.3d 1154 (2010)
James McDOLE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D10-2376.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
November 2, 2010.
James McDole, pro se, Appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Edward C. Hill, Jr., Special Counsel Criminal Appeals, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
2Per curiam
After reviewing the state's response to this Court's show cause order, we conclude that the appellant's rule 3.853 motion is facially sufficient. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853; § 925.11(1)(a)2.; (2)(a)1.-6., Fla. Stat. (2009). Thus, the trial court should have reviewed the merits of the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- McDole v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
- Hitchcock v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- Lott v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
- Cole v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.