Legal Opinion

McDole v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 2, 2010No. 1D10-2376Published

1Opinion of the Court

46 So.3d 1154 (2010)

James McDOLE, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D10-2376.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

November 2, 2010.

James McDole, pro se, Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Edward C. Hill, Jr., Special Counsel Criminal Appeals, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

2Per curiam

After reviewing the state's response to this Court's show cause order, we conclude that the appellant's rule 3.853 motion is facially sufficient. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853; § 925.11(1)(a)2.; (2)(a)1.-6., Fla. Stat. (2009). Thus, the trial court should have reviewed the merits of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. McDole v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  3. Hitchcock v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  4. Lott v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  5. Cole v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API