Legal Opinion

Mills v. Pearson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 19, 1971No. 2 Div. 538PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LAWSON, Justice.

This is an appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of Pickens County, in Equity, which established a boundary line between land of appellants and land of appellee.

Appellants have made only three assignments of error. They read :

“1. The Decree appealed from is contrary to the great weight of the evidence.
“2. The Decree appealed from is not supported by the evidence.
“3. The Decree appealed from is contrary to law.”

In view of the holdings in several of orneases, we are constrained to say that each of appellants’ assignments of error is insufficient to present any question for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Roan v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  2. Wilkins v. WoolfSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  3. Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  4. Life Casualty Ins. Co. of Tennessee v. WomackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Barnett v. MillisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Trotter v. SumnerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API