Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Fish

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1999No. 98-1758PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We adopt the findings, conclusion, and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Kentucky Bar Ass'n v. FishKentucky Supreme Court · 1999