Legal Opinion
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Fish
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 24, 1999No. 98-1758PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
We adopt the findings, conclusion, and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs are taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Disciplinary Counsel v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Kentucky Bar Ass'n v. FishKentucky Supreme Court · 1999