Kistler v. Southern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
• Appeal by defendant from Gline, J., at June Term, 1913, of Buexe. Tbis is an action to recover one barrel of beer, consigned to ' tbe plaintiff,' and beard upon an agreed statement of facts. There was judgment in favor of tbe plaintiff, and tbe defendant excepted and appealed.
1Per curiam
Tbis is a proceeding.to obtain a determination of the question whether the defendant can legally transport a .barrel of beer from a point beyond the State to Morganton, N. 0., and there deliver it to the plaintiff. The plaintiff files a brief contending that chapter 24, sec. 3, Laws 1907, forbidding such act, and the act of Congress ratified 3 March, 1913, cannot deprive him of the right to receive such consignment. The defendant in its brief avers that it is ready to obey the law if it knows what it is, and files a brief in accordance with the contention of the plaintiff. It is apparent that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Moye v. . PetwaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
- Parker v. Raleigh Savings BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Bates v. . LillySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
- Millikan v. . FoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
3Cited by5 opinions
- Person v. . WattsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Person v. Board of State Tax CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Board of Health v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Burton v. Durham Realty & InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- North Carolina Automotive Trade Ass'n v. DoughtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926