M & M Foods, Inc. v. Pacific American Fish Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*557Opinion
MOSK, J.
INTRODUCTION
M&M Foods, Inc. (M&M), filed a complaint against Pacific American Fish Co., Inc., Paul Huh, and Peter Huh1 and then petitioned the trial court to compel arbitration based on an arbitration clause in an asset purchase agreement between the parties. Pacific opposed the petition, arguing, inter alia, that M&M lacked standing to enforce the arbitration provision because the right to do so belonged exclusively to the trustee of M&M’s former bankruptcy estate. The trial court denied the petition on that ground, as well as on others. On appeal, M&M argues, inter alia, that…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Rousey v. JacowaySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Kane v. National Union Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Brown v. O'KEEFESupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Detrick v. Panalpina, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Stein v. United Artists Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cohen v. TNP 2008 Participating Notes Program, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Area 55 v. Nicholas & TomasevicCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- Area 55 v. Nicholas & Tomasevic CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Cohen v. TNP 2008 Participating Notes etc.California Court of Appeal · 2019
- Demin v. Vanderford & Ruiz CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.