Quick Service Tire Co. v. Smith
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook
The bill was filed against the defendant, Clerk of the County Court of Washington County, to recover State and County taxes alleged to have been illegally exacted and paid under protest.
The Chancellor held that the Tire Company was not subject to the tax because it did not maintain an oil depot, defined and taxed by the Revenue Act of 1925. He also found that the tax was paid under circumstances amounting to duress and under protest, and decreed a recovery under Section 1061 of Shannon’s Code.
The defendant appealed and through assignments of error insists that (1) the Chancellor’s conclusion…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Foster & Creighton Co. v. GrahamTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
- Gulf Refining Co. v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Marion CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
- General Refining & Producing Co. v. Davidson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
- St. Louis Basket & Box Co. v. Lauderdale CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nashville, C. & St. LR Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Esso Standard Oil Co. v. EvansTennessee Supreme Court · 1952
- State v. LaskowskiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Nelson v. Dixie Greyhound Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.