Legal Opinion
In re D.M.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 25, 2014No. 2013-0579Published
1Opinion of the Court
Hamilton App. No. C-120794, 2013-Ohio-668. On motions to supplement the record. Motions denied.
Pfeifer, Lanzinger, and O’Neill, JJ., dissent.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re D. M.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013