Legal Opinion
In re Jorge
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided May 26, 2017No. CASE NUMBER 15-41949PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
Kay Woods, United States Bankruptcy Judge
Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Related Contested Matter (“Arbitration Motion”) (Doc. 44) filed by Célico Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless (“Verizon”) on April 24, 2017. Verizon seeks an order staying this Court’s further consideration of the Motion for Contempt (Doc. 29) filed by Debtors David A. Jorge, Jr. and Natasha D. Jorge on October 27, 2016 and compelling the Debtors to arbitrate the Motion for Contempt. On May 18, 2017, the Debtors filed Debtors’…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hays and Company, as Trustee for Monge Oil Corporation v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Donna Marie Walls, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- David J. Pertuso, Karen A. Pertuso v. Ford Motor Credit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re BatemanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2018
- Rogne v. Digital Forensics Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2025