Legal Opinion

Jackson v. VTech Telecommunications Ltd.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 24, 2003No. 01 C 8001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CASTILLO, District Judge.

Presently before the Court are Defendants VTech Telecommunications, Ltd., VTech Communications, Inc. (collectively “VTech”) and TDS Metrocom, Inc.’s (“TDS”) motions for summary judgment against Plaintiff Philip Jackson and PMJ Family Limited Partnership (“Jackson” or “Plaintiffs”) on Jackson’s patent infringement action. For the following reasons, VTech’s motion for summary judgment is denied, (R. 137-1), and TDS’s motion for summary judgment also is denied, (R. 126-1).

RELEVANT FACTS

Jackson holds title to United States Patent No. 4,596,900…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  2. Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  3. American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. Molins Plc, and John Coventry Smith, Jr. v. Textron, Inc., Kearney & Trecker Corporation, and Avco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. Pennwalt Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tesco Corp. v. Weatherford International, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
  2. Kothmann Enterprises, Inc. v. Trinity Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API