Legal Opinion

S. Jackson & Son v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 20, 1970No. C.D. 4097PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RoseNsteiN, Judge:

The merchandise covered by the protest herein, which is described on the commercial invoice as “Four Rubber Belt Type Intermediate Carriers”, “Two Spare Rubber Belts”, “Two Major Repair Kits”, “One Set of Air Clutch Spares”, “One Set of Chain and Sprockets”, and “Six Ball Bearing Idlers”, was classified under the provision of TSUS item 664.10 for “* * * belt conveyors, and other lifting, handling, loading, or unloading machinery, and conveyors, all the foregoing and parts thereof not provided for in item 664.05”, and assessed with duty thereunder at the rate of 10.5 per…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Confiscation CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. Central Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Ex Parte Skinner & Eddy Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. Union Rolling Mill Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Barrett v. Virginian Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. AltieriCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API