Legal Opinion
Tulsa Grain Storage Co. v. Commodity Credit Corp.
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided July 14, 1964No. 5463PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARROW, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs are public warehousemen licensed under the laws of Oklahoma to engage in the grain warehouse storage business. Plaintiffs entered into contracts with the Defendant, the Commodity Credit Corporation, an agency and instrumentality of the United States, created by the Commodity Credit Corporation Charter Act (15 U.S.C.A. § 714 et seq.) for the storage of Government owned wheat. These contracts are generally known as “Uniform Grain Storage Agreements”.
Plaintiffs filed this action against the Defendant seeking a declaratory judgment directing and ordering Commodity…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Elbow Lake Cooperative Grain Company, a Minnesota Cooperative Association v. Commodity Credit Corporation, a Corporation Created by Act of CongressCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
- St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- United States v. LutherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Elbow Lake Cooperative Grain Co. v. Commodity Credit Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1956
- Blair v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Farmers Elevator Mutual Insurance Company v. The J. R. Milam Company Fidelity and Deposit Company of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Farmers Elevator Mutual Insurance v. StanfordDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1967