Legal Opinion

Eidson v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1969No. 8685PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TACKETT, Justice.

Plaintiff filed an action against defendant as a result of injuries received during the course of his employment with defendant and while engaged as a switchman in Belen, New Mexico. The jury returned a verdict adverse to plaintiff and he appeals.

Plaintiff contends under point I that the trial court erred in refusing to give his requested instructions Nos. 18 and 19 in lieu of the court’s instruction No. 10 (U.J.I. 12.10), alleging it incorrectly states causation as applied to cases under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq.).

Plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Sturgeon v. ClarkNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Lawrence Wayne Tyree v. The New York Central Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
  4. John Iannacito v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Adams v. UNITED STEELWORKERS, ETC.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Demers v. GeretyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Hudson v. OteroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Demers v. GeretyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API