Kalina v. General Hospital of the City of Syracuse
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Halpern, J. (dissenting).
I believe that the second cause of action alleged in the complaint states a good and sufficient cause of action and that the motion to dismiss the complaint should have been denied. (There are two actions, one brought by the father and the other by the mother; they will be referred to herein as if the father and mother were coplaintiffs in a single action.)
So far as the defendant General Hospital is concerned, the complaint, in my opinion, is sufficient to charge the hospital with intentional wrongdoing. The complaint alleges that after the birth of the plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Mitchell v. . Rochester Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Darcy v. . Presbyterian HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- De Wolf v. . FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Gillespie v. . Brooklyn Heights R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Gostkowski v. Roman Catholic Church of Sacred Hearts of Jesus & MaryNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.