Legal Opinion
United States of America and Donald Jackson, Special Agent v. Charles H. Stuckey, and Morry Weinstein, Intervenor-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 1, 1981No. 79-4691PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SKOPIL, Circuit Judge:
INTRODUCTION
Weinstein appeals a district court’s order enforcing administrative tax summonses issued pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7602. Weinstein failed in district court to prove his contention that the summonses were issued in bad faith in aid of a criminal prosecution. On appeal he argues that he failed because the district court improperly denied his request for discovery and abused its discretion in limiting the evidentiary proceedings.
We affirm.
FACTS
Morry Weinstein is a tax attorney who was arrested along with others by agents of the Drug Enforcement Administration…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. LaSalle National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Peter J. Serubo, Donald H. Brown, United States of America v. W. Thomas Plachter, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- United States v. AsayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Garden State National BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Bollow v. Federal Reserve Bank of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- John H. Fortney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Robert v. SnowadzkiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. ZolinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Toney Anaya and Elaine Anaya v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.