Legal Opinion

Winfield v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided April 30, 1991No. 0959-88-2PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WILLIS, J.

In this appeal, we consider whether the trial court erred in finding that the Commonwealth’s Attorney satisfied the requirements of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986), in explaining his exercise of peremptory strikes against four black veniremen. We find no error and affirm.

Doretha Winfield, a black woman, was charged with distribution of more than one-half ounce but not more than five pounds of marijuana. She elected to be tried by jury. The venire consisted of eleven white persons and nine black persons, all determined upon voir dire to be free from exception.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Martin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
  3. Gray v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  4. Taitano v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
  5. Jackson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Broady v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
  2. Goodson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996
  3. Barksdale v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
  4. Winfield v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
  5. State v. BostonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API