Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Dickinson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 15, 1914No. Appeal, No. 249PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal, No. 249, Oct. T., 1913, by plaintiff, from order of Q. S. Clearfield Co., May Sessions, 1913, No. 19, quashing indictment in case of Commonwealth v. B. M. Dickinson. Indictment for killing a deer.. Before Searle, P. J., specially presiding. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Error assigned was order quashing the indictment.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rice, P. J.,

This is an appeal by the commonwealth from an order of the court of quarter sessions quashing an indictment which charged that on November 21, 1911, the defendant did unlawfully and wilfully “kill a male deer, which did not have horns visible above the hair.” The prosecution for the alleged offense was begun before a justice of the peace in June, 1912, and resulted in the conviction of the defendant, from which, by special allowance, he appealed to the quarter sessions, wherein the indictment was found on August 26, 1913. At the time of the commission of the alleged…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Haspel v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  2. Abbott v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1839
  3. State v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth of Penna. v. BeattieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Commonwealth v. McNamaraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Commonwealth v. BelevskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Commonwealth v. DickinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  5. Armstrong v. BirdSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API