Legal Opinion

Lusk v. Parsons

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 2, 1891PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In ebrob to the County Court of Clay County; the Hon. B. D. Honboe, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.

There is no bill of exceptions in this record, hence we can not consider and pass upon the points presented on behalf of plaintiff in error, touching the alleged errors of the trial court in sustaining defendant’s demurrer to the evidence, overruling plaintiff’s motion for a new trial and entering judgment for defendant. The rulings of the court below upon questions arising in the progress of the trial, must be preserved in a bill of exceptions and also the objections and exceptions; otherwise we can not review such rulings, nor can the party excepting thereto have the benefit ^f such…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gould v. HoweIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Nat. Bank of Lawrence Co. v. Le MoyneIllinois Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jones v. City of CartervilleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1950
  2. Le Fevere v. WatsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API