Legal Opinion

Altenburg v. Sears

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 19, 1968No. [No. 117, September Term, 1967.]PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHornby, J.

The question presented by the appeal in this tort action, arising out of the rear-end collision of an ambulance with an automobile that had stopped at a traffic signal is whether the trial court erred in denying the motions of the “automobile operator” for a directed verdict or a judgment n.o.v. against the “ambulance driver” and owner of the ambulance.

The accident occurred near the intersection of the Roscoe Rowe Boulevard with North Taylor Avenue in the northerly environs of Annapolis. It was daylight, the weather was clear and the roads were dry. Both the ambulance (an authorized emergency…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brehm v. LorenzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
  2. Dunnill v. BloombergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  3. Sieland v. GalloCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  4. Garozynski v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  5. Mayor of Baltimore v. Fire Insurance Salvage CorpsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Boyer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  2. Kahler v. MartinWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Mayor of Baltimore v. HartCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Burns v. GoynesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  5. Herbert v. KlisenbauerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API