United States v. McLane
District Court, D. Maryland
In Admiralty.
1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.
The three steam-vessels above mentioned, having been seized for navigating the Chesapeake bay without complying with the terms of title 52 of the United States Revised Statutes, regulating steam-vessels, these proceedings by ivay of'libel were instituted by the United States to enforce the penalties prescribed by sections 4499 and 4500 of that article. The libels allege that the steam-vessels were found in the years 1885 and 1886 navigating waters of the United States, which are common highways of commerce, and open to general and competitive *764navigation, to-wit, the Chesapeake hay and its…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- SHERLOCK v. Alling, AdmInistratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- The Santissima Trinidad.Supreme Court of the United States · 1822
- Turner v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Packett Co. v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- The Ceylon MaruDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1920
- The MavisbrookDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1921
- The Scow No. 1District Court, E.D. New York · 1909