Legal Opinion

United States v. McLane

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided May 6, 1887PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Admiralty.

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

The three steam-vessels above mentioned, having been seized for navigating the Chesapeake bay without complying with the terms of title 52 of the United States Revised Statutes, regulating steam-vessels, these proceedings by ivay of'libel were instituted by the United States to enforce the penalties prescribed by sections 4499 and 4500 of that article. The libels allege that the steam-vessels were found in the years 1885 and 1886 navigating waters of the United States, which are common highways of commerce, and open to general and competitive *764navigation, to-wit, the Chesapeake hay and its…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. SHERLOCK v. Alling, AdmInistratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. The Santissima Trinidad.Supreme Court of the United States · 1822
  4. Turner v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. Packett Co. v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. The Ceylon MaruDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1920
  2. The MavisbrookDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1921
  3. The Scow No. 1District Court, E.D. New York · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API