Hogue v. Wilkinson
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
FANNING, Justice.
Gordon Wilkinson, a minor, by his Next Friend, Bert Wilkinson (his father), brought suit against W. P. Hogue and S. A. McCoy for the disaffirmance of two written contracts of the minor for the purchase of chinchillas, for the recovery of $1,850, paid by the minor, and for restoration of the remaining chinchillas to defendants. There were two written contracts between the minor and the defendants and each was for a pair of mated chinchillas. The first contract was executed on November 24, 1953, while plaintiff was 18 years of age; the second contract was executed on December…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Kilgore v. JordanTexas Supreme Court · 1856
- Garrard v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
- Prudential Building & Loan Ass'n v. ShawTexas Supreme Court · 1930
- Red River Valley Pub. Co. v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Wilson v. Ammann & JordanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lone Star Partners v. NationsBank Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1995
- PAK Foods Houston, LLC v. Marissa Garcia, Individually and as Next Friend of S.L.,, a Minor, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
- Vincent Murphy Chevrolet Co. v. Auto Auction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Luminant Energy Company LLC v. Public Utility Commission of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2023
- PAK Foods Houston, LLC v. Marissa Garcia, Individually and as Next Friend of S.L.,, a Minor, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.