Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State Ex Rel. Palagi v. Regan

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1942No. 8,314Published

1Concurrence

Mr. Justice Angstman:

I concur in the result reached in the foregoing opinion, but for a different reason. I do not interpret section 10807 as do my associates. "When originally enacted, section 10807, so far as material here, provided: “A candidate nominated or elected to an office, and whose nomination or election thereto has been annulled and set aside for any offense mentioned in this Act, shall not, during the period fixed by law as the term of such office be elected or appointed to fill any office or vacancy in any office or position of trust, honor or emolument under the laws of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Kommers v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API