Legal Opinion
Longmeadow Motor Co. v. Heinz (In Re Heinz)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 29, 1991No. 19-12708PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
PAUL MANNES, Chief Judge.
On July 9, 1991, this court issued an order directing plaintiff’s counsel to appear and show cause (1) why the summons and notice of pre-trial proceedings should be reissued for a fourth time in this adversary proceeding and, if so, whether counsel should be held responsible for unreasonably multiplying the proceedings and should be directed to reimburse the Clerk for fees reasonably incurred because of counsel’s conduct, and (2) why this adversary proceeding should not be dismissed upon the court’s own initiative under Federal Rule of Civil…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dr. S.B. Pardazi v. Cullman Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- George Kersh v. Norman DerozierCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Robert Norlock v. City of GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Universal Film Exchanges, Inc. v. Bernard Lust, Trading as Sydney Lust Theatres, and Independent Theatres, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
- James Powell, Jr. v. Donald StarwaltCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gazes v. Kesikrodis (In Re Ted A. Petras Furs, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1994
- Dreier v. Love (In Re Love)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1999
- Dederick & Himlie, P.A. v. DuFour (In Re DuFour)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
- Ingala v. Sciarretto (In Re Sciarretto)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
- Miller v. Cappuccilli (In Re Cappuccilli)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.