Legal Opinion

Harris v. Lavin

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 21, 1884PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL FROM FLOYD CIRCUIT COURT. [Cited, Lemoyne v. Anderson, 29 Kentucky Law Reporter 1019, 96 S. W. 843; Morgan v. Renfro, 124 Ky. 321, 99 S. W. 311.]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Holt:

This action in ordinary was brought in the name of Patrick Lavin against the appellant, James P. Harris, to recover a small tract of land. The petition is of the ordinary ejectment form.

The answer contains a general denial of the allegations of the petition; claims the land under an elder patent to that upon which the plaintiff relies; and also seeks to defeat a recovery by the plea of adverse possession and limitation.

The testimony discloses that in the year 1842 a patent issued to one, John B. Harris, for 2,475 acres of land, less 625 acres by reason of a prior claim!;…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morgan v. RenfroCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  2. Le Moyne v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cornett v. Kentucky River Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  2. Morgan v. RenfroCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  3. Le Moyne v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API