Legal Opinion

Worsham v. Fairfield Resorts, Inc.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 30, 2009No. 1058, September Term, 2007PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMeredith, J.

The question presented by this appeal is whether the applicable statute of limitations for a claim filed in Maryland pursuant to the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (“TCPA”) is four years—based upon the federal “catch all” limitation period set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1658(a)—or three years—based upon the Maryland general civil limitation period set forth in Maryland Code (1974, 2006 Repl.Vol.), Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article (“CJP”), § 5-101. We conclude that the four year limitation period imposed by 28 U.S.C. § 1658(a) applies to the present action.

Facts and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Jones v. R. R. Donnelley & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Edwards v. Emperor's Garden RestaurantNevada Supreme Court · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Davis v. Regency Lane LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  2. Giovanniello v. ALM MEDIA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  3. Anderson Office Supply, Inc. v. Advanced Medical Associates, P.A.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
  4. Wellington Homes, Inc. v. West Dundee China Palace Restaurant, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  5. Boger v. Citrix Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API