Seymour v. Wilson
New York Court of Appeals
This action was referred to the Hon. George G. Scott, as sole referee, to hear and determine the same. The facts are taken from the report of the case in 16 Barb. 294,,and are as follows: “ Conrad Cramer, on the 15th of March, 1850, recovered a judgment in this court against Ansel C. Durkee, for $67.12, damages and costs, upon a debt contracted the 1st of April, 1849. The summons was served on the 22d day of February, 1850, in the afternoon.
Read the full summary
This action was referred to the Hon. George G. Scott, as sole referee, to hear and determine the same. The facts are taken from the report of the case in 16 Barb. 294,,and are as follows: “ Conrad Cramer, on the 15th of March, 1850, recovered a judgment in this court against Ansel C. Durkee, for $67.12, damages and costs, upon a debt contracted the 1st of April, 1849. The summons was served on the 22d day of February, 1850, in the afternoon. An execution was issued upon this judgment to the sheriff of Washington county, where Durkee resided, and was returned wholly unsatisfied. Cramer…
1Opinion of the Court
Mitchell, J.,
however, was for reversal upon the merits, and wrote an opinion to that effect.
Upon the merits no five judges agreed. The cause was thereupon referred to the Hon. Reuben H. Walworth as sole referee for a third trial.
Note.—General Bullard, attorney and -counsel for one of the parties in this case, having had a long and somewhat interesting fight in it, (which is not yet terminated,) furnished the materials for the foregoing report, accompanied by a certificate of Francis Kernan, Esq., late reporter of the court of appeals, stating the grounds upon which the case was last decided…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Pope v. HartNew York Supreme Court · 1862