Legal Opinion

Goodwin v. Southern Kraft Corporation

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 3, 1942No. 6422PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff rendered service as a laborer to defendant during the month of October, 1940, and at the end of the month there was due him $50.33. He was discharged on November 1st, at which time he demanded payment of wages due him. Prior to his discharge, on each pay day, he also demanded such payment. In each instance payment was refused. He thereafter instituted this suit to recover the $50.33, and, availing himself of the beneficent provisions of Act 138 of 1936, sued for wages from the date of his discharge to the time suit was filed, a period of 91 days at $2.82 per day, and attorney's fee.

A…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Deardorf v. HunterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  2. Patterson v. Lumberman's Supply Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. E. Marqueze & Co. v. LeBlancSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1877
  4. C. & T. Schindler v. Smith, Bullins & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1866
  5. Williamson v. Natl. Benefit Life Ins.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. May v. Market Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
  2. Newson v. SavellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API