Garth v. Ewing

We are of opinion that the averments of the bill — “that it will be to the best interest of all parties to this suit, both as to the tenant for life, Robert A. Ewing, and 1¿he remaindermen, viz., the complainants James R. Ewing and Ruth K. Ewing, and the defendant, Theodus Garth, for the property hereinabove described to be divided and partitioned among them; that said land cannot be justly and equitably divided into parts, but that a sale of the same and a' division of the proceeds among those interested will better promote the interest of all the parties in interest” — though inartfully…