Legal Opinion

United States v. Missouri Valley Construction Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 12, 1983No. 82-1307PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.

The significant issue before us is whether the district court erred in failing to advise *1028the representative of defendant Missouri Valley Construction Company that it was not entitled to withdraw a guilty plea, based on a recommendation of sentence under Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(e)(1)(B). The corporate defendant, in entering its guilty plea, was told that the recommendation was not binding on the court but was not advised that the plea could not be withdrawn, as required by Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(e)(2). We hold that the district court erred and reverse and remand for further…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. George Frank Lindner v. Donald W. Wyrick, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  4. United States v. John Gregory LambrosCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  5. United States v. Raymond L. ScharfCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ricky Lee Rogers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. Missouri Valley Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. Sam T. Iaquinta, United States of America v. Velma E. ShineCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. Philip NormanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. Mark B. DebuskCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API