Legal Opinion

Holden v. Piper

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1894PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to the District Court of Pueblo County.

1Opinion of the CourtBissell, P. J.

For some years Frederick Rohrer was doing business in tbe city of Pueblo as a banker, under the name of The Bank of Pueblo. In 1890, he was appointed administrator of the estate of John T. Sullivan, and as such representative collected about forty-six hundred dollars. Of this sum, he disbursed in the course of his administration a little upwards of twelve hundred dollars, leaving 13,864.58 unaccounted for. On the last day of May, 1892, he made a statutory general assignment for the benefit of his creditors, and at the date of *72the present litigation, the defendant in error, Piper, was the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McLeod v. EvansWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Nonotuck Silk Co. v. FlandersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Little v. ChadwickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  4. First Nat. Bank v. HummelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  5. Union National Bank v. GoetzIllinois Supreme Court · 1891

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Holbrook Irrigation District v. First State BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  2. In Re McLeod's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Thorsen v. HooperOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Meldrum v. HendersonColorado Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Bottom v. BartonColorado Court of Appeals · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API