Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Westberg

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 20, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Delehanty, S.

This proceeding was begun by order to show cause why the probate decree of November 27, 1936, should not be vacated and petitioners permitted to file objections to the reception of the instrument hitherto determined to be the last will and testament of deceased. The pertinent legal principles have been many times stated. (Matter of Leslie, 175 App. Div. 108, 112; Matter of Elias, 222 id. 728; Matter of Jackson, 134 Misc. 750; affd., 227 App. Div. 777.) In the Leslie case it was said: “ It is not open to any one, merely by asserting a nebulous claim to an estate, to ask that a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of LeslieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  2. In re the Estate of JacksonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Probate of the Will of HindersonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956
  2. In re the Estate of VonhausNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  3. In re the Probate of the Will of SauerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API