Legal Opinion

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Gourary

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided November 1, 2011Published

1Opinion of the Court

*487OPINION OF THE COURT

Kristin Booth Glen, S.

This case, involving the construction of a latent ambiguity in a will clause, foregrounds the difficulty of determining close cases in the absence of a clearly enunciated burden of proof.

An earlier decision (Matter of Gourary, NYLJ, Nov. 16, 2010, at 43, col 3) denied summary judgment on an objection in this estate accounting challenging “[the Executor’s] claim that a rare book collection (the Collection)[1] worth more than $5 million at the time of decedent’s death was included in the specific bequest of tangibles,” finding a latent ambiguity2…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of KumstarNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Mahoney-Buntzman v. BuntzmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. In Re the Probate of the Will of KindbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. In re Will of LarkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. Sarhank Group v. Oracle CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API