Legal Opinion

Morris v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 19, 2010Published

1Opinion of the Court

In granting a motion pursuant to CPLR 4401 for judgment as a matter of law, the trial court must determine that by no *818rational process could the trier of fact find in favor of the nonmoving party on the evidence presented (see Szczerbiak v Pilat, 90 NY2d 553 [1997]; Alicea v Ligouri, 54 AD3d 784 [2008]; Alameldin v Kings Castle Caterers, Inc., 53 AD3d 514 [2008]). Here, the trial court properly granted the defendant’s- motion, in effect, pursuant to CPLR 4401. The plaintiffs failed to submit evidence sufficient to establish, prima facie, that the defendant had prior written notice of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Szczerbiak v. PilatNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Amabile v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Alicea v. LigouriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Farrell v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. Alameldin v. Kings Castle Caterers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API