Morris v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In granting a motion pursuant to CPLR 4401 for judgment as a matter of law, the trial court must determine that by no *818rational process could the trier of fact find in favor of the nonmoving party on the evidence presented (see Szczerbiak v Pilat, 90 NY2d 553 [1997]; Alicea v Ligouri, 54 AD3d 784 [2008]; Alameldin v Kings Castle Caterers, Inc., 53 AD3d 514 [2008]). Here, the trial court properly granted the defendant’s- motion, in effect, pursuant to CPLR 4401. The plaintiffs failed to submit evidence sufficient to establish, prima facie, that the defendant had prior written notice of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Szczerbiak v. PilatNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Amabile v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Alicea v. LigouriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Farrell v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Alameldin v. Kings Castle Caterers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008