Charley Hayashida Farms, Inc. v. Baker
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE STAMOS
delivered the opinion of the court:
Plaintiffs appeal an order dismissing the Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Company (DRGW) as an additional defendant named in amended complaints. The causes were consolidated and, because they present a typical and recurring set of facts arising in the wake of Penn Central’s reorganization, the Union Pacific Railroad was granted leave to file an amicus curiae brief.
The pertinent facts in both Hayashida and Demase are closely parallel. Each plaintiff delivered perishable produce together with a through Bill of Lading to the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Louisiana & Western Railroad v. GardinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Leigh Ellis & Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Proctor v. Wells Bros. of New YorkIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.