Legal Opinion

Sunset Harbour North Condominium Ass'n v. Robbins

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 26, 2003No. Nos. 3D02-2258, 3D02-2316PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The taxpayer, a condominium under construction, challenged property appraiser’s valuation for the tax year 1997 in the amount of $22,000,000.00, arguing that, pursuant to Section 192.042, Florida Statutes, it should have received a zero -value for ad valorem taxation because it was not “substantially completed” as of January 1 of the tax year. The property appraiser put up a general denial with an affirmative defense asserting the constitutional invalidity of Section 192.042, Florida Statutes, supra. The trial judge agreed with the property appraiser and held Section 192.042 unconstitutional.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fuchs v. RobbinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. Fuchs v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Florida · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gilreath v. Westgate Daytona, Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  2. SUNSET HARBOUR NO. CONDO. ASS'N v. RobbinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API