Legal Opinion

Plakstis v. Cadieu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 10, 1989PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

— In an action to recover damages for malicious prosecution, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roncallo, J.), dated September 22, 1987, which denied his motion to vacate his default in replying to the defendants’ *446counterclaims, and in answering the defendants’ interrogatories.

Ordered that the order is reversed, as a matter of discretion, without costs or disbursements, and the plaintiff’s motion is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that the plaintiff’s time to serve replies to the counterclaims and interrogatories is extended until 30 days after service…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Read v. DicksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Jet Asphalt Corp. v. Consolidated Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Flower v. Maryliz Food & Drink Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Gilhuley v. St. Matthew's Community A.M.E. Church of Hollis, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Plakstis v. CadieuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API