Legal Opinion

Stanard v. Miller

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 19, 1925No. 8 Div. 733PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, X

The appeal was from decree of the probate court rejecting the probate of the alleged will offered for probate. Rulings on evidence are challenged and presented for decision.

It was competent to ask the witness Mrs. Garrett: “Do these sheets of paper contain what Birdie Crute dictated to you?” (Goldsmith v. Gates, 205 Ala. 632, 88 So. 861); it was necessary in identification of the document propounded for probate. Hall’s Heirs v. Hall’s Executors, 38 Ala. 131; Chandler v. Chandler, 204 Ala. 164, 166, 85 So. 558; 51 L. R. A. (N. S.) 930, note; L. R. A. 1916C,,1221. After the death of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Barnewall v. MurrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. Fowlkes v. ClaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Roberts v. TrawickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1848
  5. Henry v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnston v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  2. deGRAAF v. OwenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Hays v. MarschallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API