Legal Opinion

Gooden v. Bradshaw

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 2012No. 2011-1943PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam. Jesse L. Gooden, pro se. Michael DeWine, Attorney General, and Gene D. Park, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying the petition of appellant, Jesse L. Gooden, for a writ of habeas corpus to compel his immediate release from prison. Gooden had an adequate remedy by way of appeal to raise his claim of sentencing error. Roberts v. Knab, 131 Ohio St.3d 60, 2012-Ohio-56, 960 N.E.2d 457, ¶ 1. And as the court of appeals recognized, “[t]he different numbering of the counts in the indictment and verdict forms was neither…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Roberts v. KnabOhio Supreme Court · 2012

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Taylor v. BradshawOhio Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API