Legal Opinion

City of Springville v. Fullmer

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1891PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment made upon an order granting a non-suit and from an order refusing a new trial of the district court of the first district. The opinion •states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

ZANE, C. J.:

This is an appeal from an order of nonsuit, and also ■from an order overruling appellant's motion for a new trial. The action was for an injunction to restrain the respondent from diverting the waters of Sage creek and Fullmer springs. It appears from the evidence in the record that these waters were appropriated in 1862 to •domestic and agricultural uses by six men, and that with their express consent Springville took control of them in 1876, and since then has distributed them hy its water-master, according to rules and regulations made by authority of ordinances, to a portion…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lehi Irrigation Co. v. MoyleUtah Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Levy v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jack v. Village of GrangevilleIdaho Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Holman v. Pleasant Grove CityUtah Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Fisher v. Bountiful CityUtah Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Davis v. Midvale CityUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Mt. Olivet Cemetery Ass'n v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API