Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Grobe

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 13, 1905PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Hardin District Court.— HoN. W. D. EvaNS, Judge. ■ ActioN on a claim for $230 against an estate. An item of $17 was allowed, and tbe balance of tbe claim rejected. Tbe claimant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGlaiN, J.

Tbe finding of facts by tbe trial court was that there was a contract between' Mrs. Aldinger, tbe claimant, and tbe deceased, whereby tbe latter agreed to pay to tbe former $200, if she would go to Chicago -to see a woman whom be was desirous of'marrying, and give her information concerning him, and that claimant went, to Chicago in pursuance of this contract, and incurred certain expenses, all at the request of deceased. Tbe court allowed a portion of tbe claim, which was for money advanced, but denied recovery for compensation on account of services rendered, on tbe ground that tbe contract…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Morrison v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Donaldson v. Eaton & EstesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. State v. LeiferNew York Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Rainbow International Marriage Service v. Ping CuiMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002
  4. Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. v. Securities and Exchange CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API