Legal Opinion

In Re the Search of Apple iPhone, IMEI 013888003738427

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 26, 2014No. Criminal No. 2014-0278PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JOHN M. FACCIOLA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pending before the Court is an Application for a search and seizure warrant pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure for an Apple iPhone 4. See Affidavit In Support of Application for Search Warrant at 6 (hereinafter the “Affidavit”). 1 In response to this Court’s recent rulings with respect to the proper scope of searches of electronic devices, 2 the government has provided a detailed “Attachment B” — which lists the items to be seized from the iPhone — and a new section, entitled “Electronic…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Maryland v. GarrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Dalia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States v. Leigh Raymond TamuraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  2. STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHRISTOPHER MCLAWHORNCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2020
  3. United States v. OkaforDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API